Road Injury - Post-Collision Care
Priority Setting Partnership
IMPACT have held the UK’s first road Injury Priority Setting Partnership (PSP), addressing what happens in the crucial moments after a road traffic collision. The Top Ten research priorities have now been established.
While road safety research has traditionally prioritised prevention, far less attention has been given to the evidence needed to improve emergency response, clinical care, coordination between services, and recovery following serious road injury.
Led by IMPACT, the Centre for Post‑Collision Research, Innovation and Translation, at Devon Air Ambulance, the partnership brought together people with lived experience of road injury, such as patients, members of the public, emergency responders, clinicians, researchers, charities and policy partners. Working as equal contributors, participants identified the most important unanswered questions about post‑collision care to help shape where future research and innovation should be focused.
The PSP was made possible through funding from Transport Scotland and Vision Zero South West, and delivered in partnership with the Faculty of Pre‑Hospital Care (Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh). The priorities agreed through this process create a shared, publicly identified research agenda to inform future studies, funding decisions, policy discussions and system improvement related to road injury in the UK.The Top Ten
Priority 1
Priority 2
Priority 3
Priority 4
Priority 5
Priority 6
Priority 7
Priority 8
Priority 9
Priority 10
The Report
Loading Viewer…
How The Process Worked
Establish a Steering Group
This group takes responsibility for the PSP process, including oversight, direction and planning. It is made up of carers, members of the public and a range of professionals with lived experience of post-collision road injury.
Collect questions
Ask a wide range of people with lived experience to submit any questions they’d like to be researched. Review existing literature to see if these have already been answered or if there are any gaps.
Summarise the responses gathered
Questions are reviewed and sorted into themes, creating summary questions for research.
Check the evidence
This long list of summary questions is then checked against existing literature to ensure they are unanswered by research; questions that have already been addressed are removed.
Create a shortlist of summary questions
The long list of summary questions are put through a prioritisation process in order to produce a shortlist to be discussed at a workshop.
Hold a Workshop
The shortlist of questions is discussed in a structured workshop of people with lived experience (professionals, carers, patients, public) who collectively agree on a final Top Ten priorities for research.
The longlist of Questions
- How safe and effective are basic spinal care techniques, such as helmet removal or casualty rolling, when done by bystanders at the scene of a collision, and do step-by-step instructions help reduce the risk of injury?
- Which urgent treatments work best for people trapped after a collision, and how can non-medical responders safely provide them?
- After a road traffic collision, which types of deaths could potentially be avoided with the right help at the right time—and when are those critical moments where quick action can make the biggest difference?
- How often do collisions go undetected in rural areas, and which technologies, such as sensors, drones, or satellite, work best to spot them quickly and get help there fast?
- How does being ready to treat injured children, along with quickly involving the right medical team and giving doctors feedback, affect how well children are assessed and recover after road traffic collisions?
- How does time spent at the scene of rural road collisions affect survival, especially when taking into account the type and severity of injuries?
- How many road traffic collisions are caused by a medical event and how are these identified and managed by prehospital responders
- When should hospitals be alerted about incoming road traffic collision patients, and who should be responsible for sending that alert?
- Do collisions involving electric vehicles lead to different types or levels of injury compared with non-electric cars?
- Since regional trauma networks were introduced, does the time it takes to provide airway support for patients with major trauma differ between night and day, and how does this affect patient outcomes?
- What makes people hesitate or delay calling emergency services straight after a road traffic collision, and what kinds of changes, such as education, laws, or system improvements, can help people call for help faster, especially in different communities?
- Can using technology, such as mobile apps, video calls, or live coaching, help people give better first aid and improve outcomes for those injured in road traffic collisions, when compared to just using a phone call for guidance?
- What crash details should automatically be sent from a vehicle after a collision to help emergency services respond faster and more accurately, without sending false alerts?
- What are the most reliable signs, at the scene of a road traffic collision, for spotting hidden life-threatening injuries such as internal bleeding or brain trauma?
- When is it better for someone involved in a collision to get out of the vehicle themselves or with help from bystanders, rather than waiting for emergency services?
- How do tools like checklists, real-time guidance, or dashboards affect the speed, quality, and fairness of trauma care delivery before patients reach hospital?
- How does using telemedicine to guide trauma care, especially in rural areas, affect triage decisions, patient outcomes, costs, and how efficiently patients are transferred?
- Can AI help emergency services spot serious injuries more accurately than human call handlers, using collision photos, call audio, or past data? And what are the challenges?
- Can wearable tech detect road traffic collisions and send helpful information to emergency services when no one sees the collision—and can it be made to work reliably?
- How long do air ambulances wait to land at crash scenes, and what is preventing roads from being closed quickly to let them land? What could help fix this?
- What’s the best way to decide how road traffic collision victims should be transported, especially in rural areas, and which non-medical responders should be trained to make those decisions?
- What legal and data-sharing constraints exist for automated alerts from vehicles or wearables?
- What kinds of training, tools, and guidelines help emergency call handlers (dispatchers) better recognise serious injuries from road traffic collisions and send the right help quickly?
- Can video technology in emergency calls, help call handlers better judge injuries and send the right help, compared to voice-only calls? What privacy and practical issues need to be considered?
- How can police, fire, and medical teams work better together at the scene of a road traffic collision to speed up rescue and improve patient outcomes, and what training or systems support this best?
- Should injured people go to hospital in a police or private car instead of waiting for an ambulance, and how does this affect their recovery or survival?
- How do long hospital handover times affect ambulance response to collisions, and what impact does this have on patient outcomes?
- What psychological effects do bystanders face after helping at the scene of a road traffic collision, and how can support be designed to encourage action while protecting their mental health?
- How safe, effective, and acceptable is it for members of the public, with no medical training, to give tranexamic acid (TXA) to people who may be bleeding after a road traffic collision?
- What are the best ways to teach people in the community how to give first aid after serious injuries, and can training everyone help save lives in road traffic collisions?
- Do tailored training programmes for bystanders to improve care and outcomes at the scene of a collision, and how can we measure the benefits?
- What risks do rescuers and bystanders face when helping at the scene of a collision, and how can we protect their physical and mental wellbeing?
- What are the best ways to safely rescue people from large or specialist vehicles, such as lorries or military trucks, and which parts of professional rescue methods could be safely used by bystanders?
- How could linking information across ambulance, hospital and recovery services help improve care and outcomes after road traffic collision injuries?
- What does a successful recovery after a road injury really mean, and are researchers measuring what matters most to patients and their families?
- At what point does taking longer to free someone from a vehicle lead to worse physical or mental health outcomes, and how do different rescue methods affect this?
- In road traffic collisions, how do factors such as age, gender, and background
influence the types of injuries people get and the care they receive, and what can
be done to reduce inequalities? - How can rehab after road injuries be better organised, starting early, involving families, and linking medical care with social, legal, and financial support, to help survivors recover, return to work, and improve quality of life
- How do language, culture, and poverty affect emergency responses to road collisions, and what can be done to reduce these inequalities?
- How could linking information across ambulance, hospital and recovery services help improve care and outcomes after road traffic collision injuries?
- What does a successful recovery after a road injury really mean, and are researchers measuring what matters most to patients and their families?
- What makes people hesitate or delay calling emergency services straight after a road traffic collision, and what kinds of changes, such as education, laws, or system improvements, can help people call for help faster, especially in different communities?
- Can using technology, such as mobile apps, video calls, or live coaching, help people give better first aid and improve outcomes for those injured in road traffic collisions, when compared to just using a phone call for guidance?
- At what point does taking longer to free someone from a vehicle lead to worse physical or mental health outcomes, and how do different rescue methods affect this?
- In road traffic collisions, how do factors such as age, gender, and background influence the types of injuries people get and the care they receive, and what can be done to reduce inequalities?
- What psychological effects do bystanders face after helping at the scene of a road traffic collision, and how can support be designed to encourage action while protecting their mental health?
- What kinds of training, tools, and guidelines help emergency call handlers (dispatchers) better recognise serious injuries from road traffic collisions and send the right help quickly?
- How can police, fire, and medical teams work better together at the scene of a road traffic collision to speed up rescue and improve patient outcomes, and what training or systems support this best?
- What crash details should automatically be sent from a vehicle after a collision to help emergency services respond faster and more accurately, without sending false alerts?
- What are the most reliable signs, at the scene of a road traffic collision, for spotting hidden life-threatening injuries such as internal bleeding or brain trauma?
- How safe and effective are basic spinal care techniques, such as helmet removal or casualty rolling, when done by bystanders at the scene of a collision, and do step-by-step instructions help reduce the risk of injury?
- Which urgent treatments work best for people trapped after a collision, and how can non-medical responders safely provide them?
- After a road traffic collision, which types of deaths could potentially be avoided with the right help at the right time—and when are those critical moments where quick action can make the biggest difference?
- When is it better for someone involved in a collision to get out of the vehicle themselves or with help from bystanders, rather than waiting for emergency services?
- How safe, effective, and acceptable is it for members of the public, with no medical training, to give tranexamic acid (TXA) to people who may be bleeding after a road traffic collision?
- What are the best ways to teach people in the community how to give first aid after serious injuries, and can training everyone help save lives in road traffic collisions?
- Do tailored training programmes for bystanders to improve care and outcomes at the scene of a collision, and how can we measure the benefits?
- How do tools like checklists, real-time guidance, or dashboards affect the speed, quality, and fairness of trauma care delivery before patients reach hospital?
- What risks do rescuers and bystanders face when helping at the scene of a collision, and how can we protect their physical and mental wellbeing?
- How does using telemedicine to guide trauma care, especially in rural areas, affect triage decisions, patient outcomes, costs, and how efficiently patients are transferred?
- Should injured people go to hospital in a police or private car instead of waiting for an ambulance, and how does this affect their recovery or survival?
- What are the best ways to safely rescue people from large or specialist vehicles, such as lorries or military trucks, and which parts of professional rescue methods could be safely used by bystanders?
- How often do collisions go undetected in rural areas, and which technologies, such as sensors, drones, or satellite, work best to spot them quickly and get help there fast?
- How does being ready to treat injured children, along with quickly involving the right medical team and giving doctors feedback, affect how well children are assessed and recover after road traffic collisions?
- How can rehab after road injuries be better organised, starting early, involving families, and linking medical care with social, legal, and financial support, to help survivors recover, return to work, and improve quality of life
- Can AI help emergency services spot serious injuries more accurately than human call handlers, using collision photos, call audio, or past data? And what are the challenges?
- How do language, culture, and poverty affect emergency responses to road collisions, and what can be done to reduce these inequalities?
- Can wearable tech detect road traffic collisions and send helpful information to emergency services when no one sees the collision—and can it be made to work reliably?
- Can video technology in emergency calls, help call handlers better judge injuries and send the right help, compared to voice-only calls? What privacy and practical issues need to be considered?
- How do long hospital handover times affect ambulance response to collisions, and what impact does this have on patient outcomes?
- How does time spent at the scene of rural road collisions affect survival, especially when taking into account the type and severity of injuries?
- How many road traffic collisions are caused by a medical event and how are these identified and managed by prehospital responders
- How long do air ambulances wait to land at crash scenes, and what is preventing roads from being closed quickly to let them land? What could help fix this?
- When should hospitals be alerted about incoming road traffic collision patients, and who should be responsible for sending that alert?
- What’s the best way to decide how road traffic collision victims should be transported, especially in rural areas, and which non-medical responders should be trained to make those decisions?
- What legal and data-sharing constraints exist for automated alerts from vehicles or wearables?
- Do collisions involving electric vehicles lead to different types or levels of injury compared with non-electric cars?
- Since regional trauma networks were introduced, does the time it takes to provide airway support for patients with major trauma differ between night and day, and how does this affect patient outcomes?
What Happens Next
Strengthening lived‑experience involvement
People with lived experience were central to shaping these priorities and will remain central as the work progresses. Ongoing involvement will support the interpretation of priorities, co‑production of new research, advisory and oversight roles, and evaluation of emerging evidence – ensuring future work stays grounded in real‑world needs.
Enabling and influencing funding
To maximise impact, the priorities will be actively shared with research funders, charities and commissioning bodies. This will help align funding decisions with the Top Ten, support researchers to develop proposals that respond directly to the priorities, and encourage themed funding calls where targeted investment is most needed.
Integrating priorities into national and local strategies
The findings will be shared with organisations involved in road safety, trauma care, emergency response and health planning at national, regional and local levels. This will support alignment with existing frameworks, including those based on the Road Injury Chain of Survival, and help embed the priorities into policy development, commissioning and long‑term system planning.
Promoting transparency and open access
All outputs from the Priority Setting Partnership – including the report, methodology and final priorities – are publicly available. Open access supports transparency, reduces duplication, and enables organisations across the sector to apply the findings in research, service improvement and policy work.
Coordinated communication and dissemination
A strategic, collaborative approach will be used to maintain momentum and awareness. Progress will be shared through multiple channels, including publications, events, professional forums, social media and lived‑experience networks. Partners will help amplify the priorities and highlight emerging work responding to them.
Supporting translation into research and practice
Work will continue to help translate broad priorities into high‑quality, fundable research questions. This includes facilitating researcher–stakeholder collaboration, encouraging cross‑sector and interdisciplinary approaches, and sharing examples of progress, impact and learning as studies and initiatives develop.
Who has funded this work?
This PSP is jointly funded by Transport Scotland and Vision Zero South West. Transport Scotland’s contribution supports the printing and publication of materials, open access fees for publications, and dissemination activities. Vision Zero South West provides funding for project coordination, survey administration, and organisation of the final prioritisation workshop. The funders had no role in the design, conduct, analysis, interpretation, or prioritisation decisions, which remain entirely under the authority of the Steering Group