Road Injury - Post-Collision Care

Priority Setting Partnership

IMPACT have held the UK’s first road Injury Priority Setting Partnership (PSP), addressing what happens in the crucial moments after a road traffic collision. The Top Ten research priorities have now been established.

While road safety research has traditionally prioritised prevention, far less attention has been given to the evidence needed to improve emergency response, clinical care, coordination between services, and recovery following serious road injury.

Led by IMPACT, the Centre for Post‑Collision Research, Innovation and Translation, at Devon Air Ambulance, the partnership brought together people with lived experience of road injury, such as patients, members of the public, emergency responders, clinicians, researchers, charities and policy partners. Working as equal contributors, participants identified the most important unanswered questions about post‑collision care to help shape where future research and innovation should be focused.

The PSP was made possible through funding from Transport Scotland and Vision Zero South West, and delivered in partnership with the Faculty of Pre‑Hospital Care (Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh). The priorities agreed through this process create a shared, publicly identified research agenda to inform future studies, funding decisions, policy discussions and system improvement related to road injury in the UK.

The Top Ten

Priority 1

After a road traffic collision, which types of deaths could potentially be avoided with the right help at the right time – and when are those critical moments where quick action can make the biggest difference?
Injuries from road traffic collisions lead to many deaths worldwide, mostly from head injuries and severe bleeding. Across studies, up to 80% of these deaths could be prevented if people received faster, better care. Time is critical. Around one in three deaths happen in the first hour, and treatment within the first 15 minutes offers the best chance of survival. Quick actions such as stopping bleeding, managing the airway, and getting patients to hospital rapidly can save lives. In lower-income countries, preventable deaths are more common due to limited access to advanced trauma care and delays in reaching treatment. Overall, improving outcomes after serious road traffic collisions requires faster emergency responses, better prehospital care, and rapid transfer to specialist centres. Integrating these steps into coordinated trauma systems can help ensure people get life-saving treatment when they need it most.

Priority 2

What are the most reliable signs, at the scene of a road traffic collision, for spotting hidden life-threatening injuries such as internal bleeding or brain trauma?
‘Occult’ injuries are serious internal injuries from road traffic collisions that are not obvious at first glance. A person might look fine at the scene, but still have life-threatening damage, especially to the head or abdomen. Researchers have developed scoring tools, like the Occult Score and Transfer Score, to help identify these hidden injuries and decide who should go to a trauma centre. These tools use road traffic collision details, not just visible injuries or vital signs. However, more work is needed to test these tools in real-life settings, especially in rural or lower-income areas, and to help dispatchers and bystanders use this knowledge effectively.

Priority 3

How can police, fire, and medical teams work better together at the scene of a road traffic collision to speed up rescue and improve patient outcomes, and what training or systems support this best?
When someone is trapped in a vehicle after a road traffic collision, police, fire, and medical teams all need to work together quickly. Research shows that delays often happen when roles are unclear or when too many responders crowd the scene. Newer strategies, like the EXIT method and joint training between fire crews and paramedics, can make rescues faster and safer. However, these approaches are not used everywhere, and still lack strong evidence on how they affect patient survival. More real-world testing and better coordination policies are urgently required.

Priority 4

Can using technology, such as mobile apps, video calls, or live coaching, help people give better first aid and improve outcomes for those injured in road traffic collisions, when compared to just using a phone call for guidance?
New technology like apps, video calling, and real-time coaching can help bystanders give better first aid in emergencies. These tools have been shown to improve survival after cardiac arrest by helping people start CPR quickly and do it properly. However, most tools focus on heart-related emergencies, not the kinds of injuries seen after road traffic collisions. For trauma, evidence is still limited. Some studies show dispatcher help by phone may support life-saving actions, but results are mixed. More research is needed to develop technology that works in road traffic collision situations and gives clear, fast help for bleeding, airway problems, and other trauma injuries.

Priority 5

What details should automatically be sent from a vehicle after a road traffic collision to help emergency services respond faster and more accurately, without sending false  alerts?
What details should automatically be sent from a vehicle after a road traffic collision to help emergency services respond faster and more accurately, without sending false  alerts? eCall and Advanced Automatic Crash Notification (AACN) systems help emergency services respond quickly to serious road traffic collisions. They work by automatically sending key information such as crash severity, seatbelt use, airbag deployment, and exact location to dispatch teams. This helps decide what level of help is needed, even if the people involved can’t call for help themselves. Research shows these systems can reduce missed serious injuries and improve response. However, they can also send too many false alarms. To improve, systems must reliably send data, even in rural areas, and use smarter algorithms that learn from past road traffic collisions to better predict who needs urgent care.

Priority 6

What are the most effective ways to teach and support bystanders to provide first aid after road traffic collisions (including community training, telemedicine and digital  tools), and how can the benefits of these approaches be measured?
Teaching members of the public how to recognise and respond to life-threatening injuries after a road traffic collision can save lives, and simple tools such as the sBATT score show that serious trauma can often be identified using visible clues, such as confusion, heavy bleeding, fast breathing, or being trapped in a vehicle, without the need for medical equipment. Early evidence suggests that bystanders can sometimes recognise critical problems such as airway issues, bleeding, or hypothermia, but they often underestimate how severe bleeding is and may struggle to judge how urgently help is needed. Many other signs, including changes in alertness, heart rate, or breathing, could potentially support emergency responders, though it remains unclear whether bystanders can reliably assess them. As new approaches such as community training, telemedicine support, and digital tools become more common, further research is needed to understand which methods most effectively teach and support bystanders to provide first aid after road traffic collisions, and how best to measure the benefits of these approaches in real-world situations.

Priority 7

What kinds of training, tools, and guidelines help emergency call handlers (dispatchers) better recognise serious injuries from road traffic collisions and send the right help quickly?
When someone is badly hurt in a road traffic collision, emergency call handlers (dispatchers) must quickly decide what help to send. Current systems often miss serious injuries or send too much help. Some new tools, like computer programmes that analyse what callers say, can support dispatchers, especially when they are unsure. Training and clear protocols also help, but many are not specific to road traffic collisions. Most research comes from wealthy countries, so we don’t know what works best elsewhere. More research is needed to create simple, road-specific tools that help dispatchers send the right help, quickly and reliably, every time.

Priority 8

In road traffic collisions, how do factors such as age, gender, and background influence the types of injuries people get and the care they receive, and what can be done to reduce inequalities?
Who you are can affect how you’re treated after a road traffic collision. Older people often get hurt more easily, even in low-speed road traffic collisions, and women are more likely to be trapped in vehicles and have different types of injuries than men. People with lower income or education may also face delays in getting help. Current triage systems don’t always account for these differences, which can lead to unfair care. To fix this, we need better tools that consider age, gender, and background when making emergency decisions, and safer vehicles designed with all types of people in mind.

Priority 9

Which urgent treatments work best for people trapped after a road traffic collision, and how can non-medical responders safely provide them?
Entrapped patients are at higher risk of severe injuries that require urgent treatment. There is, however, little high-quality evidence for which interventions are more effective in this group. Current practice relies on wider trauma evidence and expert consensus, focusing on early fluid resuscitation and medication to mitigate the consequences of muscle breakdown. Bystanders may have a role in initial management, but evidence is lacking. Further research is needed to identify the most effective interventions and improve survival in this group.

Priority 10

What does a successful recovery after a road injury really mean, and are researchers measuring what matters most to patients?
There are many outcome measures for defining “successful outcomes” following trauma, but the outcome measures which exist are not universally applied in research. Further the commonly used outcome measures have not been developed in line with what patients consider to be successful outcomes which is largely around their subjective assessment and sense of self rather than the degree of functional disability. More work is needed to define a suitable outcome measure and align research with consistently applying it in studies.

The Report

Loading Viewer…

How The Process Worked

Establish a Steering Group

This group takes responsibility for the PSP process, including oversight, direction and planning. It is made up of carers, members of the public and a range of professionals with lived experience of post-collision road injury. 

Collect questions

Ask a wide range of people with lived experience to submit any questions they’d like to be researched. Review existing literature to see if these have already been answered or if there are any gaps.

Summarise the responses gathered

Questions are reviewed and sorted into themes, creating summary questions for research.

Check the evidence

This long list of summary questions is then checked against existing literature to ensure they are unanswered by research; questions that have already been addressed are removed.

Create a shortlist of summary questions

The long list of summary questions are put through a prioritisation process in order to produce a shortlist to be discussed at a workshop.

Hold a Workshop

The shortlist of questions is discussed in a structured workshop of people with lived experience (professionals, carers, patients, public) who collectively agree on a final Top Ten priorities for research. 

The longlist of Questions

  • How safe and effective are basic spinal care techniques, such as helmet removal or casualty rolling, when done by bystanders at the scene of a collision, and do step-by-step instructions help reduce the risk of injury?
  • Which urgent treatments work best for people trapped after a collision, and how can non-medical responders safely provide them?
  • After a road traffic collision, which types of deaths could potentially be avoided with the right help at the right time—and when are those critical moments where quick action can make the biggest difference?
  • How often do collisions go undetected in rural areas, and which technologies, such as sensors, drones, or satellite, work best to spot them quickly and get help there fast?
  • How does being ready to treat injured children, along with quickly involving the right medical team and giving doctors feedback, affect how well children are assessed and recover after road traffic collisions?
  • How does time spent at the scene of rural road collisions affect survival, especially when taking into account the type and severity of injuries?
  • How many road traffic collisions are caused by a medical event and how are these identified and managed by prehospital responders
  • When should hospitals be alerted about incoming road traffic collision patients, and who should be responsible for sending that alert?
  • Do collisions involving electric vehicles lead to different types or levels of injury compared with non-electric cars?
  • Since regional trauma networks were introduced, does the time it takes to provide airway support for patients with major trauma differ between night and day, and how does this affect patient outcomes?
  • What makes people hesitate or delay calling emergency services straight after a road traffic collision, and what kinds of changes, such as education, laws, or system improvements, can help people call for help faster, especially in different communities?
  • Can using technology, such as mobile apps, video calls, or live coaching, help people give better first aid and improve outcomes for those injured in road traffic collisions, when compared to just using a phone call for guidance?
  • What crash details should automatically be sent from a vehicle after a collision to help emergency services respond faster and more accurately, without sending false alerts?
  • What are the most reliable signs, at the scene of a road traffic collision, for spotting hidden life-threatening injuries such as internal bleeding or brain trauma?
  • When is it better for someone involved in a collision to get out of the vehicle themselves or with help from bystanders, rather than waiting for emergency services?
  • How do tools like checklists, real-time guidance, or dashboards affect the speed, quality, and fairness of trauma care delivery before patients reach hospital?
  • How does using telemedicine to guide trauma care, especially in rural areas, affect triage decisions, patient outcomes, costs, and how efficiently patients are transferred?
  • Can AI help emergency services spot serious injuries more accurately than human call handlers, using collision photos, call audio, or past data? And what are the challenges?
  • Can wearable tech detect road traffic collisions and send helpful information to emergency services when no one sees the collision—and can it be made to work reliably?
  • How long do air ambulances wait to land at crash scenes, and what is preventing roads from being closed quickly to let them land? What could help fix this?
  • What’s the best way to decide how road traffic collision victims should be transported, especially in rural areas, and which non-medical responders should be trained to make those decisions?
  • What legal and data-sharing constraints exist for automated alerts from vehicles or wearables?
  • What kinds of training, tools, and guidelines help emergency call handlers (dispatchers) better recognise serious injuries from road traffic collisions and send the right help quickly?
  • Can video technology in emergency calls, help call handlers better judge injuries and send the right help, compared to voice-only calls? What privacy and practical issues need to be considered?
  • How can police, fire, and medical teams work better together at the scene of a road traffic collision to speed up rescue and improve patient outcomes, and what training or systems support this best?
  • Should injured people go to hospital in a police or private car instead of waiting for an ambulance, and how does this affect their recovery or survival?
  • How do long hospital handover times affect ambulance response to collisions, and what impact does this have on patient outcomes?
  • What psychological effects do bystanders face after helping at the scene of a road traffic collision, and how can support be designed to encourage action while protecting their mental health?
  • How safe, effective, and acceptable is it for members of the public, with no medical training, to give tranexamic acid (TXA) to people who may be bleeding after a road traffic collision?
  • What are the best ways to teach people in the community how to give first aid after serious injuries, and can training everyone help save lives in road traffic collisions?
  • Do tailored training programmes for bystanders to improve care and outcomes at the scene of a collision, and how can we measure the benefits?
  • What risks do rescuers and bystanders face when helping at the scene of a collision, and how can we protect their physical and mental wellbeing?
  • What are the best ways to safely rescue people from large or specialist vehicles, such as lorries or military trucks, and which parts of professional rescue methods  could be safely used by bystanders?
  • How could linking information across ambulance, hospital and recovery services help improve care and outcomes after road traffic collision injuries?
  • What does a successful recovery after a road injury really mean, and are researchers measuring what matters most to patients and their families?
  • At what point does taking longer to free someone from a vehicle lead to worse physical or mental health outcomes, and how do different rescue methods affect this?
  • In road traffic collisions, how do factors such as age, gender, and background
    influence the types of injuries people get and the care they receive, and what can
    be done to reduce inequalities?
  • How can rehab after road injuries be better organised, starting early, involving families, and linking medical care with social, legal, and financial support, to help survivors recover, return to work, and improve quality of life
  • How do language, culture, and poverty affect emergency responses to road collisions, and what can be done to reduce these inequalities?
  • How could linking information across ambulance, hospital and recovery services help improve care and outcomes after road traffic collision injuries?
  • What does a successful recovery after a road injury really mean, and are researchers measuring what matters most to patients and their families?
  • What makes people hesitate or delay calling emergency services straight after a road traffic collision, and what kinds of changes, such as education, laws, or system improvements, can help people call for help faster, especially in different communities?
  • Can using technology, such as mobile apps, video calls, or live coaching, help people give better first aid and improve outcomes for those injured in road traffic collisions, when compared to just using a phone call for guidance?
  • At what point does taking longer to free someone from a vehicle lead to worse physical or mental health outcomes, and how do different rescue methods affect this?
  • In road traffic collisions, how do factors such as age, gender, and background influence the types of injuries people get and the care they receive, and what can be done to reduce inequalities?
  • What psychological effects do bystanders face after helping at the scene of a road traffic collision, and how can support be designed to encourage action while protecting their mental health?
  • What kinds of training, tools, and guidelines help emergency call handlers (dispatchers) better recognise serious injuries from road traffic collisions and send the right help quickly?
  • How can police, fire, and medical teams work better together at the scene of a road traffic collision to speed up rescue and improve patient outcomes, and what training or systems support this best?
  • What crash details should automatically be sent from a vehicle after a collision to help emergency services respond faster and more accurately, without sending false alerts?
  • What are the most reliable signs, at the scene of a road traffic collision, for spotting hidden life-threatening injuries such as internal bleeding or brain trauma?
  • How safe and effective are basic spinal care techniques, such as helmet removal or casualty rolling, when done by bystanders at the scene of a collision, and do step-by-step instructions help reduce the risk of injury?
  • Which urgent treatments work best for people trapped after a collision, and how can non-medical responders safely provide them?
  • After a road traffic collision, which types of deaths could potentially be avoided with the right help at the right time—and when are those critical moments where quick action can make the biggest difference?
  • When is it better for someone involved in a collision to get out of the vehicle themselves or with help from bystanders, rather than waiting for emergency services?
  • How safe, effective, and acceptable is it for members of the public, with no medical training, to give tranexamic acid (TXA) to people who may be bleeding after a road traffic collision?
  • What are the best ways to teach people in the community how to give first aid after serious injuries, and can training everyone help save lives in road traffic collisions?
  • Do tailored training programmes for bystanders to improve care and outcomes at the scene of a collision, and how can we measure the benefits?
  • How do tools like checklists, real-time guidance, or dashboards affect the speed, quality, and fairness of trauma care delivery before patients reach hospital?
  • What risks do rescuers and bystanders face when helping at the scene of a collision, and how can we protect their physical and mental wellbeing?
  • How does using telemedicine to guide trauma care, especially in rural areas, affect triage decisions, patient outcomes, costs, and how efficiently patients are transferred?
  • Should injured people go to hospital in a police or private car instead of waiting for an ambulance, and how does this affect their recovery or survival?
  • What are the best ways to safely rescue people from large or specialist vehicles, such as lorries or military trucks, and which parts of professional rescue methods  could be safely used by bystanders?
  • How often do collisions go undetected in rural areas, and which technologies, such as sensors, drones, or satellite, work best to spot them quickly and get help there fast?
  • How does being ready to treat injured children, along with quickly involving the right medical team and giving doctors feedback, affect how well children are assessed and recover after road traffic collisions?
  • How can rehab after road injuries be better organised, starting early, involving families, and linking medical care with social, legal, and financial support, to help survivors recover, return to work, and improve quality of life
  • Can AI help emergency services spot serious injuries more accurately than human call handlers, using collision photos, call audio, or past data? And what are the challenges?
  • How do language, culture, and poverty affect emergency responses to road collisions, and what can be done to reduce these inequalities?
  • Can wearable tech detect road traffic collisions and send helpful information to emergency services when no one sees the collision—and can it be made to work reliably?
  • Can video technology in emergency calls, help call handlers better judge injuries and send the right help, compared to voice-only calls? What privacy and practical issues need to be considered?
  • How do long hospital handover times affect ambulance response to collisions, and what impact does this have on patient outcomes?
  • How does time spent at the scene of rural road collisions affect survival, especially when taking into account the type and severity of injuries?
  • How many road traffic collisions are caused by a medical event and how are these identified and managed by prehospital responders
  • How long do air ambulances wait to land at crash scenes, and what is preventing roads from being closed quickly to let them land? What could help fix this?
  • When should hospitals be alerted about incoming road traffic collision patients, and who should be responsible for sending that alert?
  • What’s the best way to decide how road traffic collision victims should be transported, especially in rural areas, and which non-medical responders should be trained to make those decisions?
  • What legal and data-sharing constraints exist for automated alerts from vehicles or wearables?
  • Do collisions involving electric vehicles lead to different types or levels of injury compared with non-electric cars?
  • Since regional trauma networks were introduced, does the time it takes to provide airway support for patients with major trauma differ between night and day, and how does this affect patient outcomes?
“Our partnership is committed to reducing the number of deaths and serious injuries on Devon & Cornwall’s roads – and post-collision care is vital in this ambition. We are extremely fortunate to have such experienced and passionate clinical practitioners involved with IMPACT and based right here in Devon. Their ground-breaking work has already led to changes in national guidance around casualty extrication from vehicles and their ongoing work in the post-collision field is both exciting and important. Vision Zero South West is delighted to support this amazing work, which we are certain will have major positive implications for road safety in the future.”
Alison Hernandez, Police & Crime Commissioner for Devon, Cornwall & The Isles of Scilly
Chair of Vision Zero South West
"This report is the result of genuine collaboration; patients, responders, clinicians and researchers working toward a common goal. The Faculty of Pre-Hospital Care is proud to have been part of that process. When the right people share the same table, the work that follows can save lives. The Top Ten research priorities identified are proof of that."
Dr Andy Smith, Chair
FPHC

What Happens Next

Identifying the Top Ten research priorities is not the end of the journey – it is the point where real‑world impact begins. The following steps set out how these priorities will be taken forward to influence research, policy and practice

Strengthening lived‑experience involvement

People with lived experience were central to shaping these priorities and will remain central as the work progresses. Ongoing involvement will support the interpretation of priorities, co‑production of new research, advisory and oversight roles, and evaluation of emerging evidence – ensuring future work stays grounded in real‑world needs.

Enabling and influencing funding

To maximise impact, the priorities will be actively shared with research funders, charities and commissioning bodies. This will help align funding decisions with the Top Ten, support researchers to develop proposals that respond directly to the priorities, and encourage themed funding calls where targeted investment is most needed.

Integrating priorities into national and local strategies

The findings will be shared with organisations involved in road safety, trauma care, emergency response and health planning at national, regional and local levels. This will support alignment with existing frameworks, including those based on the Road Injury Chain of Survival, and help embed the priorities into policy development, commissioning and long‑term system planning.

Promoting transparency and open access

All outputs from the Priority Setting Partnership – including the report, methodology and final priorities – are publicly available. Open access supports transparency, reduces duplication, and enables organisations across the sector to apply the findings in research, service improvement and policy work.

Coordinated communication and dissemination

A strategic, collaborative approach will be used to maintain momentum and awareness. Progress will be shared through multiple channels, including publications, events, professional forums, social media and lived‑experience networks. Partners will help amplify the priorities and highlight emerging work responding to them.

Supporting translation into research and practice

Work will continue to help translate broad priorities into high‑quality, fundable research questions. This includes facilitating researcher–stakeholder collaboration, encouraging cross‑sector and interdisciplinary approaches, and sharing examples of progress, impact and learning as studies and initiatives develop.

Who has funded this work?

This PSP is jointly funded by Transport Scotland and Vision Zero South West. Transport Scotland’s contribution supports the printing and publication of materials, open access fees for publications, and dissemination activities. Vision Zero South West provides funding for project coordination, survey administration, and organisation of the final prioritisation workshop. The funders had no role in the design, conduct, analysis, interpretation, or prioritisation decisions, which remain entirely under the authority of the Steering Group